DCG
You are here: Home : Publications : DCG Reports : All Reports

Contact:
Drylands Coordination Group Secretariat
Grensen 9b
0159 Oslo, Norway
Phone +47 23 10 94 90
Fax +47 23 10 94 94
Email
DCG Newsletter:
Your email:


subscribe
unsubscribe
User section:
Username:

Password:


Pastoralists in Southern Ethiopia:Dispossession, Access to Resources and Dialogue with Policy Makers
DCG Report 53
Size: 855 kb


 Eyasu Elias

Pastoralism provides both a living and a way of life to millions of people in Ethiopia. It makes a significant contribution to the national economies both in terms of supporting their own households and in terms of export earnings of live animals and animal products (meat, hides and skins). In spite of their economic contributions, the Ethiopian pastoralists have been subject to political marginalisation. There are increasing trends of pastoral land dispossession in favour of development projects which impoverish pastoral societies, restrict their access to natural resources and limit their mobility. The pastoral mode of life based on mobility is perceived as backward and as needing to be transformed. Government development efforts have tended to focus on sedentarisation of pastoralists in favour of cultivation instead of transhumant nomadism. Policies have tried to implement externally imposed development schemes which most often involved alienation and expropriation of pastoral lands in favour of large scale commercial activities.

This study closely examines the various forms of land dispossession such as land grabbing for agriculture, private ranches or industrial projects and the impacts of land alienation on pastoral livelihoods at the household level in the case study sites.

The study found that 100% of the Karaau and 79% of the Borena households have lost their traditional grazing and watering resources for non-pastoral uses. The causes for the land alienation are many and complex but the main ones include alienation by the state for commercial production and demarcated as national parks and ranches for wildlife conservation and border disputes involving tribal conflicts. There are many traditional grazing and watering resources that are no more accessible to pastoral uses.

Finally, the report makes specific policy recommendations:

  1. Recognition to group user rights
  2. Legal backing for customary institutions
  3. Ecological considerations


Editor Abdramane Dembélé | About DCG | Website funded by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs | Site developed by Noop